- .git-commit-template.txt: 커밋 메시지 템플릿 추가 - .gitignore: OS 및 데이터베이스 관련 파일 무시 설정 추가 - .mcp.json: MCP 서버 설정 추가 - CLAUDE.md: SuperClaude 엔트리 포인트 문서 추가 - README.md: 프로젝트 템플릿 설명 추가 - .claude/COMMANDS.md: 명령어 실행 프레임워크 문서 추가 - .claude/FLAGS.md: 플래그 시스템 문서 추가 - .claude/MCP.md: MCP 서버 통합 문서 추가 - .claude/MODES.md: 운영 모드 문서 추가 - .claude/ORCHESTRATOR.md: 지능형 라우팅 시스템 문서 추가 - .claude/PERSONAS.md: 페르소나 시스템 문서 추가 - .claude/PRINCIPLES.md: 핵심 원칙 문서 추가 - .claude/RULES.md: 실행 가능한 규칙 문서 추가 - .claude/settings.json: 권한 설정 추가 - .claude/commands 디렉토리: 다양한 명령어 문서 추가 - .taskmaster/config.json: 기본 설정 파일 추가 - .taskmaster/docs 디렉토리: 문서 파일 추가 - .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json: 기본 작업 파일 추가
524 lines
22 KiB
Markdown
524 lines
22 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Glob, TodoWrite]
|
|
description: Creates a comprehensive system architecture framework including domain separation, layered architecture, and component responsibility definitions.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Create Architecture Framework
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
- **User Request:** $ARGUMENTS
|
|
- **PRD Source:** Identified by `--prd` argument (PRD session name or index).
|
|
- **Source PRD:** Final PRD document from the specified PRD session directory.
|
|
- **Architecture Directory:** `.taskmaster/docs/design/architecture/`
|
|
|
|
## Goal
|
|
To transform product requirements from a completed PRD into a comprehensive system architecture framework that defines domain boundaries, architectural layers, component responsibilities, and foundational patterns necessary for scalable and maintainable software development.
|
|
|
|
## Process
|
|
|
|
1. **Identify Source PRD Session:**
|
|
- Use the `--prd` argument to locate the correct PRD session directory (e.g., `.taskmaster/docs/prd/001-enterprise-expansion/`).
|
|
- Find the final PRD document (`product-requirements-document_*.md`) within the session directory.
|
|
|
|
2. **Extract Architecture Requirements from PRD:**
|
|
- **Functional Requirements:** Core features and business capabilities
|
|
- **Non-Functional Requirements:** Performance, scalability, security, reliability
|
|
- **Technical Constraints:** Platform requirements, integration needs, compliance
|
|
- **User Experience Requirements:** Response time, availability, user load
|
|
- **Business Requirements:** Growth projections, market constraints, budget limitations
|
|
|
|
3. **Determine Architecture Session Index:**
|
|
- Scan the `.taskmaster/docs/design/architecture/` directory to find the highest existing session index.
|
|
- Assign the next sequential number for the new architecture session.
|
|
|
|
4. **Create Architecture Session Directory:**
|
|
- Create a new directory named `[index]-[prd_session_name]` inside `.taskmaster/docs/design/architecture/`.
|
|
- Example: `.taskmaster/docs/design/architecture/001-enterprise-expansion/`
|
|
|
|
5. **Initialize Architecture Session State:**
|
|
- Create a `_session-state.json` file in the new architecture session directory.
|
|
- Initialize it with architecture session details:
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"index": 1,
|
|
"name": "prd-session-name",
|
|
"type": "architecture",
|
|
"status": "initialized",
|
|
"created": "ISO datetime",
|
|
"lastUpdated": "ISO datetime",
|
|
"currentStep": "architecture_framework_creation",
|
|
"completedSteps": [],
|
|
"nextAction": "Generate comprehensive architecture framework",
|
|
"sourceType": "prd",
|
|
"sourceName": "prd-session-name",
|
|
"architectureScope": "system-wide|domain-specific|service-specific",
|
|
"architectureStyle": "layered|microservices|event-driven|hybrid",
|
|
"architectureResults": {}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
6. **Perform Domain Analysis:**
|
|
- **Domain Identification:** Identify business domains and bounded contexts from PRD features
|
|
- **Domain Modeling:** Create domain models and understand domain relationships
|
|
- **Bounded Context Mapping:** Define context boundaries and integration patterns
|
|
- **Domain Events:** Identify key domain events and workflows
|
|
- **Subdomain Classification:** Classify subdomains as core, supporting, or generic
|
|
|
|
7. **Design Layered Architecture:**
|
|
- **Presentation Layer:** User interface, API endpoints, controllers
|
|
- **Application Layer:** Application services, use cases, workflow orchestration
|
|
- **Domain Layer:** Domain entities, value objects, domain services, aggregates
|
|
- **Infrastructure Layer:** Data access, external services, technical concerns
|
|
- **Cross-Cutting Concerns:** Logging, security, monitoring, configuration
|
|
|
|
8. **Define Component Responsibilities:**
|
|
- **Component Identification:** Identify major system components and modules
|
|
- **Responsibility Assignment:** Define clear responsibilities for each component
|
|
- **Interface Design:** Design component interfaces and contracts
|
|
- **Dependency Management:** Establish dependency rules and patterns
|
|
- **Component Interaction:** Define communication patterns between components
|
|
|
|
9. **Generate Architecture Framework Document:**
|
|
- Create the primary architecture document named `architecture-framework_[prd_session_name].md`.
|
|
- Structure content according to the architecture framework template.
|
|
- Include:
|
|
- **Architecture Overview:** High-level architecture vision and principles
|
|
- **Domain Architecture:** Domain boundaries and context mapping
|
|
- **Layered Architecture:** Layer definitions and responsibilities
|
|
- **Component Architecture:** Component design and interfaces
|
|
- **Architecture Patterns:** Key architectural patterns and decisions
|
|
- **Quality Attributes:** Architecture support for quality requirements
|
|
|
|
10. **Update Session State:**
|
|
- Set `status` to `framework_complete`.
|
|
- Update `architectureResults` with architecture metrics and components.
|
|
- Record completion timestamp.
|
|
|
|
11. **Notify User with Architecture Insights:**
|
|
- Inform the user that the architecture framework has been successfully generated.
|
|
- Provide the file path and key architectural highlights.
|
|
- **Suggest logical next steps based on framework outcomes:**
|
|
- "Your architecture framework is complete. Consider designing detailed components using `/design/system-architecture/2-design-components --name=[session_name]`"
|
|
- "Review the domain boundaries with your team to validate business alignment."
|
|
- "Use the layered architecture to guide development team organization and responsibilities."
|
|
|
|
## Templates & Structures
|
|
|
|
### Architecture Framework Template
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# System Architecture Framework: [PRD Session Name]
|
|
|
|
**Created:** [Date]
|
|
**Source:** PRD Session: [PRD Session Name]
|
|
**Architecture Style:** [Layered/Microservices/Event-Driven/Hybrid]
|
|
**Target Scale:** [Small/Medium/Large/Enterprise]
|
|
**Last Updated:** [Date]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Architecture Overview
|
|
|
|
### Architecture Vision
|
|
- **Vision Statement:** [Clear architectural vision aligned with business goals]
|
|
- **Architecture Principles:** [Fundamental principles guiding architectural decisions]
|
|
- **Design Philosophy:** [Overall approach to system design and evolution]
|
|
- **Success Criteria:** [How architectural success will be measured]
|
|
|
|
### Architecture Drivers
|
|
- **Business Drivers:** [Key business requirements driving architecture]
|
|
- **Technical Drivers:** [Technical requirements and constraints]
|
|
- **Quality Drivers:** [Quality attributes and non-functional requirements]
|
|
- **Constraint Drivers:** [Platform, budget, time, and regulatory constraints]
|
|
|
|
### Architecture Characteristics
|
|
- **Scalability:** [Horizontal and vertical scaling approach]
|
|
- **Reliability:** [Fault tolerance and resilience patterns]
|
|
- **Performance:** [Performance targets and optimization strategies]
|
|
- **Security:** [Security architecture and protection mechanisms]
|
|
- **Maintainability:** [Code organization and maintenance strategies]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Domain Architecture
|
|
|
|
### Domain Identification
|
|
#### Core Domain: [Primary Business Domain]
|
|
- **Description:** [What this domain represents in the business]
|
|
- **Key Entities:** [Main business entities and concepts]
|
|
- **Business Rules:** [Critical business rules and constraints]
|
|
- **Value Proposition:** [How this domain creates business value]
|
|
|
|
#### Supporting Domain: [Secondary Business Domain]
|
|
- **Description:** [What this domain represents in the business]
|
|
- **Key Entities:** [Main business entities and concepts]
|
|
- **Business Rules:** [Critical business rules and constraints]
|
|
- **Value Proposition:** [How this domain supports core business]
|
|
|
|
#### Generic Domain: [Utility Domain]
|
|
- **Description:** [What this domain represents in the business]
|
|
- **Key Entities:** [Main business entities and concepts]
|
|
- **Business Rules:** [Critical business rules and constraints]
|
|
- **Value Proposition:** [How this domain provides utility]
|
|
|
|
### Bounded Context Mapping
|
|
#### Context 1: [Context Name]
|
|
- **Responsibility:** [What this context is responsible for]
|
|
- **Boundaries:** [Clear boundaries and what's included/excluded]
|
|
- **Interfaces:** [How this context exposes its capabilities]
|
|
- **Dependencies:** [Other contexts this depends on]
|
|
|
|
#### Context 2: [Context Name]
|
|
- **Responsibility:** [What this context is responsible for]
|
|
- **Boundaries:** [Clear boundaries and what's included/excluded]
|
|
- **Interfaces:** [How this context exposes its capabilities]
|
|
- **Dependencies:** [Other contexts this depends on]
|
|
|
|
### Domain Events
|
|
- **Event 1:** [Event Name] - [When it occurs and what it represents]
|
|
- **Event 2:** [Event Name] - [When it occurs and what it represents]
|
|
- **Event 3:** [Event Name] - [When it occurs and what it represents]
|
|
|
|
### Context Integration Patterns
|
|
- **Shared Kernel:** [Shared models and libraries between contexts]
|
|
- **Customer-Supplier:** [Upstream/downstream relationships]
|
|
- **Conformist:** [One context conforms to another's model]
|
|
- **Anti-Corruption Layer:** [Protection against external models]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Layered Architecture
|
|
|
|
### Presentation Layer
|
|
#### Responsibility
|
|
- User interface components and user interaction handling
|
|
- API endpoints and request/response handling
|
|
- Input validation and output formatting
|
|
- User authentication and session management
|
|
|
|
#### Components
|
|
- **Web Controllers:** [REST API controllers and request handlers]
|
|
- **UI Components:** [User interface components and views]
|
|
- **API Gateways:** [API gateway and routing logic]
|
|
- **Authentication Middleware:** [Authentication and authorization components]
|
|
|
|
#### Design Patterns
|
|
- **MVC Pattern:** [Model-View-Controller for web interfaces]
|
|
- **API Gateway Pattern:** [Centralized API management]
|
|
- **Frontend-Backend Separation:** [Clear separation of concerns]
|
|
|
|
### Application Layer
|
|
#### Responsibility
|
|
- Application services and use case orchestration
|
|
- Business workflow coordination
|
|
- Transaction management
|
|
- Application-specific business logic
|
|
|
|
#### Components
|
|
- **Application Services:** [Use case implementations and workflow coordination]
|
|
- **Command Handlers:** [Command pattern implementations]
|
|
- **Query Handlers:** [Query pattern implementations]
|
|
- **Workflow Orchestrators:** [Business process coordination]
|
|
|
|
#### Design Patterns
|
|
- **Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS):** [Separate read/write operations]
|
|
- **Mediator Pattern:** [Request/response handling]
|
|
- **Unit of Work Pattern:** [Transaction management]
|
|
|
|
### Domain Layer
|
|
#### Responsibility
|
|
- Core business logic and domain rules
|
|
- Domain entities and value objects
|
|
- Domain services and aggregates
|
|
- Business invariants and constraints
|
|
|
|
#### Components
|
|
- **Domain Entities:** [Core business objects with identity]
|
|
- **Value Objects:** [Immutable objects representing concepts]
|
|
- **Domain Services:** [Business logic that doesn't belong to entities]
|
|
- **Aggregates:** [Consistency boundaries and transaction scopes]
|
|
- **Domain Events:** [Business events and event handlers]
|
|
|
|
#### Design Patterns
|
|
- **Domain-Driven Design (DDD):** [Domain modeling and bounded contexts]
|
|
- **Repository Pattern:** [Data access abstraction]
|
|
- **Factory Pattern:** [Complex object creation]
|
|
- **Strategy Pattern:** [Business rule variations]
|
|
|
|
### Infrastructure Layer
|
|
#### Responsibility
|
|
- Data persistence and external service integration
|
|
- Technical infrastructure and cross-cutting concerns
|
|
- Framework and technology-specific implementations
|
|
- System integration and communication
|
|
|
|
#### Components
|
|
- **Data Access Layer:** [Database access and ORM implementations]
|
|
- **External Service Clients:** [Third-party service integrations]
|
|
- **Message Brokers:** [Asynchronous communication infrastructure]
|
|
- **Configuration Management:** [Application configuration and settings]
|
|
|
|
#### Design Patterns
|
|
- **Repository Pattern:** [Data access abstraction]
|
|
- **Adapter Pattern:** [External service integration]
|
|
- **Decorator Pattern:** [Cross-cutting concerns]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Component Architecture
|
|
|
|
### Component Identification
|
|
#### Component 1: [Component Name]
|
|
- **Purpose:** [What this component does and why it exists]
|
|
- **Responsibilities:** [Specific responsibilities and capabilities]
|
|
- **Interfaces:** [Public interfaces and contracts]
|
|
- **Dependencies:** [Other components this depends on]
|
|
- **Technology:** [Technology stack and frameworks]
|
|
|
|
#### Component 2: [Component Name]
|
|
- **Purpose:** [What this component does and why it exists]
|
|
- **Responsibilities:** [Specific responsibilities and capabilities]
|
|
- **Interfaces:** [Public interfaces and contracts]
|
|
- **Dependencies:** [Other components this depends on]
|
|
- **Technology:** [Technology stack and frameworks]
|
|
|
|
### Component Interaction Patterns
|
|
- **Synchronous Communication:** [REST APIs, direct method calls]
|
|
- **Asynchronous Communication:** [Message queues, event streams]
|
|
- **Data Sharing:** [Shared databases, data stores]
|
|
- **Service Discovery:** [How components find each other]
|
|
|
|
### Component Deployment
|
|
- **Deployment Units:** [How components are packaged and deployed]
|
|
- **Scalability:** [How components scale independently]
|
|
- **Fault Isolation:** [How component failures are contained]
|
|
- **Monitoring:** [How components are monitored and observed]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Architecture Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Architectural Style
|
|
- **Primary Style:** [Layered/Microservices/Event-Driven/Hybrid]
|
|
- **Style Rationale:** [Why this style was chosen]
|
|
- **Style Benefits:** [Benefits this style provides]
|
|
- **Style Trade-offs:** [Trade-offs and limitations]
|
|
|
|
### Key Patterns
|
|
#### Pattern 1: [Pattern Name]
|
|
- **Problem:** [What problem this pattern solves]
|
|
- **Solution:** [How the pattern addresses the problem]
|
|
- **Implementation:** [How this pattern is implemented]
|
|
- **Benefits:** [Benefits of using this pattern]
|
|
- **Trade-offs:** [Costs and limitations]
|
|
|
|
#### Pattern 2: [Pattern Name]
|
|
- **Problem:** [What problem this pattern solves]
|
|
- **Solution:** [How the pattern addresses the problem]
|
|
- **Implementation:** [How this pattern is implemented]
|
|
- **Benefits:** [Benefits of using this pattern]
|
|
- **Trade-offs:** [Costs and limitations]
|
|
|
|
### Integration Patterns
|
|
- **API Gateway:** [Centralized API management and routing]
|
|
- **Service Mesh:** [Service-to-service communication]
|
|
- **Event Sourcing:** [Event-driven state management]
|
|
- **CQRS:** [Command Query Responsibility Segregation]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Quality Attributes
|
|
|
|
### Performance Architecture
|
|
- **Response Time:** [Target response times and performance budgets]
|
|
- **Throughput:** [Expected transaction volumes and capacity]
|
|
- **Resource Usage:** [Memory, CPU, and storage considerations]
|
|
- **Caching Strategy:** [Caching layers and invalidation policies]
|
|
|
|
### Scalability Architecture
|
|
- **Horizontal Scaling:** [Scale-out capabilities and patterns]
|
|
- **Vertical Scaling:** [Scale-up capabilities and limitations]
|
|
- **Auto-scaling:** [Automatic scaling triggers and policies]
|
|
- **Load Distribution:** [Load balancing and traffic distribution]
|
|
|
|
### Reliability Architecture
|
|
- **Fault Tolerance:** [Failure handling and recovery patterns]
|
|
- **Resilience Patterns:** [Circuit breakers, retries, timeouts]
|
|
- **Backup and Recovery:** [Data backup and disaster recovery]
|
|
- **High Availability:** [Redundancy and failover mechanisms]
|
|
|
|
### Security Architecture
|
|
- **Authentication:** [User authentication and identity management]
|
|
- **Authorization:** [Access control and permission management]
|
|
- **Data Protection:** [Encryption and data privacy]
|
|
- **Security Monitoring:** [Threat detection and response]
|
|
|
|
### Maintainability Architecture
|
|
- **Code Organization:** [Module structure and dependency management]
|
|
- **Testing Strategy:** [Testing architecture and automation]
|
|
- **Documentation:** [Architecture documentation and knowledge management]
|
|
- **Evolution:** [Architecture evolution and refactoring strategies]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Architecture Decisions
|
|
|
|
### Decision 1: [Decision Topic]
|
|
- **Context:** [Situation requiring a decision]
|
|
- **Decision:** [What was decided]
|
|
- **Rationale:** [Why this decision was made]
|
|
- **Consequences:** [Impact and implications]
|
|
- **Alternatives:** [Other options considered]
|
|
|
|
### Decision 2: [Decision Topic]
|
|
- **Context:** [Situation requiring a decision]
|
|
- **Decision:** [What was decided]
|
|
- **Rationale:** [Why this decision was made]
|
|
- **Consequences:** [Impact and implications]
|
|
- **Alternatives:** [Other options considered]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Guidance
|
|
|
|
### Development Approach
|
|
- **Development Methodology:** [Agile, incremental, iterative approach]
|
|
- **Team Organization:** [How teams align with architecture]
|
|
- **Technology Standards:** [Coding standards and technology guidelines]
|
|
- **Quality Practices:** [Code review, testing, and quality assurance]
|
|
|
|
### Architecture Governance
|
|
- **Architecture Review:** [Architecture review process and criteria]
|
|
- **Change Management:** [How architecture changes are managed]
|
|
- **Compliance:** [Architecture compliance and enforcement]
|
|
- **Evolution:** [Architecture evolution and improvement]
|
|
|
|
### Risk Management
|
|
- **Technical Risks:** [Key technical risks and mitigation strategies]
|
|
- **Architecture Risks:** [Architecture-specific risks and responses]
|
|
- **Integration Risks:** [Component integration and system risks]
|
|
- **Performance Risks:** [Performance and scalability risks]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
### Immediate Actions
|
|
1. **Component Design:** [Design detailed component specifications]
|
|
2. **Integration Planning:** [Plan component integration and communication]
|
|
3. **Technology Selection:** [Select specific technologies and frameworks]
|
|
4. **Prototype Development:** [Develop architecture proof-of-concept]
|
|
|
|
### Architecture Validation
|
|
- **Architecture Review:** [Conduct formal architecture review]
|
|
- **Stakeholder Alignment:** [Ensure stakeholder agreement and buy-in]
|
|
- **Technical Validation:** [Validate technical feasibility and approach]
|
|
- **Risk Assessment:** [Assess and mitigate architecture risks]
|
|
|
|
### Development Preparation
|
|
- **Team Preparation:** [Prepare development teams for implementation]
|
|
- **Environment Setup:** [Set up development and testing environments]
|
|
- **Tooling Selection:** [Select development tools and frameworks]
|
|
- **Documentation:** [Create detailed implementation documentation]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Appendices
|
|
|
|
### A. PRD Requirements Analysis
|
|
[Summary of PRD requirements and their architectural implications]
|
|
|
|
### B. Architecture Diagrams
|
|
[High-level architecture diagrams and component relationships]
|
|
|
|
### C. Technology Evaluation
|
|
[Technology evaluation criteria and selection rationale]
|
|
|
|
### D. Performance Modeling
|
|
[Performance projections and capacity planning]
|
|
|
|
### E. Security Assessment
|
|
[Security requirements and threat modeling]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Session State Structure
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"index": 1,
|
|
"name": "prd-session-name",
|
|
"type": "architecture",
|
|
"status": "framework_complete",
|
|
"created": "ISO datetime",
|
|
"lastUpdated": "ISO datetime",
|
|
"currentStep": "framework_complete",
|
|
"completedSteps": ["architecture_framework_creation", "domain_analysis", "layer_design"],
|
|
"nextAction": "Ready for component design or integration architecture",
|
|
"sourceType": "prd",
|
|
"sourceName": "prd-session-name",
|
|
"architectureScope": "system-wide",
|
|
"architectureStyle": "layered",
|
|
"architectureResults": {
|
|
"domains": 3,
|
|
"layers": 4,
|
|
"components": 12,
|
|
"patterns": 8,
|
|
"qualityAttributes": 5,
|
|
"decisions": 6,
|
|
"createdDate": "ISO datetime"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Best Practices
|
|
|
|
### ✅ DO: Requirements-Driven Architecture
|
|
- **Start with PRD requirements** and ensure architecture serves business needs
|
|
- **Prioritize quality attributes** based on business priorities and user needs
|
|
- **Consider growth and evolution** when designing architectural foundations
|
|
- **Balance flexibility with simplicity** to avoid over-engineering
|
|
|
|
**Why:** Requirements-driven architecture ensures that architectural decisions support business objectives and user value.
|
|
|
|
### ✅ DO: Domain-Driven Design
|
|
- **Identify clear domain boundaries** and model business concepts accurately
|
|
- **Use ubiquitous language** that bridges business and technical teams
|
|
- **Separate core domains** from supporting and generic domains
|
|
- **Design for domain evolution** and changing business requirements
|
|
|
|
**Why:** Domain-driven design creates architecture that reflects business reality and can evolve with business needs.
|
|
|
|
### ✅ DO: Layered Responsibility
|
|
- **Maintain clear layer separation** with well-defined responsibilities
|
|
- **Follow dependency rules** to ensure proper architectural flow
|
|
- **Avoid layer violations** and maintain architectural integrity
|
|
- **Design clean interfaces** between layers and components
|
|
|
|
**Why:** Layered responsibility creates maintainable, testable, and evolvable architecture.
|
|
|
|
### ❌ DON'T: Technology-First Architecture
|
|
- **Don't start with technology choices** before understanding requirements
|
|
- **Don't let technology constraints** drive architectural decisions
|
|
- **Don't ignore business requirements** in favor of technical preferences
|
|
- **Don't create architecture** that serves technology rather than business
|
|
|
|
**Why:** Technology-first architecture often results in solutions that don't meet business needs or user requirements.
|
|
|
|
### ❌ DON'T: Premature Optimization
|
|
- **Don't optimize for performance** before understanding actual requirements
|
|
- **Don't add complexity** for theoretical future needs
|
|
- **Don't over-engineer** solutions beyond current requirements
|
|
- **Don't ignore simplicity** in favor of sophisticated patterns
|
|
|
|
**Why:** Premature optimization creates unnecessary complexity and can hinder business agility and development velocity.
|
|
|
|
## Output
|
|
- **Format:** Comprehensive architecture framework with domain and layer design
|
|
- **Location:** `.taskmaster/docs/design/architecture/[index]-[prd_session_name]/`
|
|
- **Primary Files:**
|
|
- `architecture-framework_[prd_session_name].md` - Main architecture framework
|
|
- `_session-state.json` - Session tracking and metadata
|
|
|
|
## Example Usage
|
|
- **Create architecture framework from PRD:**
|
|
`/design/system-architecture/1-create-architecture-framework --prd="enterprise-expansion"`
|
|
- **Create by PRD index:**
|
|
`/design/system-architecture/1-create-architecture-framework --prd="1"` |